Add all adjustment layers, masks, other edits.Output from raw converter to 8-bit for final minor tweaks.Add as many corrections as possible in Photoshop raw converter.Yet if you start with 16-bit color, you have so many levels to work with, you can apply many rounds of image edits without having any perceptible impact on the eventual 8-bit tone distribution. If you only start out with 256 levels of gray, even a few color adjustments will bring the tone distribution below the minimum threshold necessary to be perceived as smooth. Every time you make an adjustment (think curves, levels, brightness or contrast, etc.), you are in effect moving some of the original tone values one way or another, in effect creating gaps in the tone map. It turns out that 256 levels (8-bit) of gray per color is barely enough tone values to be perceived as a smooth blend. The human eye is quite good at perceiving abrupt changes in tone (think of banding in a blend, for example). The answer lies in preserving quality even after image adjustments or retouching. The question then, is why bother storing twice the data when you aren't going to use it anyway? Yet when an image is rendered to JPG for the Web or CMYK for print, each channel is limited to 8-bit. Most digital cameras now give you the option of taking photographs with 16-bit grayscale per color channel. Note that while both gradients appeared smooth before the corrections, the 8-bit image shows visible banding while the 16-bit image does not. The gradient bar we originally applied to the bottom of the image visually confirms what the dialog boxes are telling us. Because there are thousands of levels ofl gray in each 16-bit channel, you have lots of extra data to work with while still maintaining a smooth tone distribution. The 16-bit image shows none of the gaps in tone that occurred with the 8-bit image above. Contrast this with the 16-bit image below. We applied two corrections to each of our image versions: First, we opened levels and moved the slider from 1.0 to 1.15 Second, we opened curves and moved the 160 level to 180.Īfter applying these changes, we opened the levels dialog box again to demonstrate the gaps in tone that resulted when retouching the 8-bit image, even after just two corrections. We flattened the layers so the bar would reflect the tone changes resulting from the corrections we planned to apply. Because neither image has been retouched, the gradient looks perfectly smooth on both the 8-bit and 16-bit images. We added a grayscale bar at the bottom of each version of the image. We duplicated the original file and opened one as 8-bit and one as 16-bit. Photoshop's Camera Raw plug-in gives you the option of opening the image as either an 8-bit or 16-bit image. We started with an image of a model car, taken with a Canon digital camera. That's why we've started with the demonstration, which is followed by a more in-depth explanation below. 8-bit JPG when taking digital camera photographs is easy to demonstrate but harder to explain. The reason why you should opt for 16-bit camera RAW vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |